does the rep actually work here?

idreamidrive · Post by **idreamidrive** » January 18, 2007

cause it didnt do anything when i gave it to someone

Post by 77 » January 18, 2007

No, it doesn't seem to. I write funny things in there though. Funny to me, I don't give a shit if you laugh or not.

Post by **Sean @ NDF** » January 18, 2007

you might be able to see it in user cp..

Toby, ditch the sig dude - its pissing me off

Post by 77 » January 18, 2007

Sean @ ESG wrote:Toby, ditch the sig dude - its pissing me off

Shhh... it's peaceful protest because my suggestions have fallen on deaf ears. Or, blind eyes, as it were.

Post by **Sean @ NDF** » January 18, 2007

it's not a protest, we asked for larger avatars...not sigs. No one wants a 800x800 sig. You'd have to be a complete moron to keep that shit

Post by 77 » January 18, 2007

I would like there to be a limitation in pixel size. Until then, my signature will stay. Actually, according to the current terms, my signature cannot be minimized. Thus it shall remain MAXIMIZED!

Post by **Sean @ NDF** » January 18, 2007

ok, I agree with you on TAKING IT TO THE MAX! But just because there is no limit set right now, doesn't mean you have to piss me off all night.

Munster/Jon/Robry/SFC are probably sleeping right now, and they're the only ones who can change it.

idreamidrive · Post by **idreamidrive** » January 18, 2007

thanks eric. and i cant even quote you can i cant view your full sig

idreamidrive · Post by **idreamidrive** » January 18, 2007

Sean @ ESG wrote:ok, I agree with you on TAKING IT TO THE MAX! But just because there is no limit set right now, doesn't mean you have to piss me off all night.

Munster/Jon/Robry/SFC are probably sleeping right now, and they're the only ones who can change it.

you personally can choose to not view sigs, or even avatars. i got that rawking right now

Post by **Sean @ NDF** » January 18, 2007

But I enjoy signatures...some are funny and change often *cough, mine, cough* and I like to see them and laff