I'm excited to announce that thejdm is now updated to the latest phpbb 3.2 software. You may notice the site is now mobile friendly but with the upgrade comes some hiccups. theGarage, theGallery, theArcade are no longer supported. In due time the developers should be working to release the modifications to work on the new software. #LetsMakeForumsGreatAgain

2005 CRX?

fourth generation civic & crx tech. [84-91]

Moderator: Nikku

CivicRacingGirl7
50% ricer
Posts: 417
Joined: February 04, 2003
Location: NY
Contact:

Post by CivicRacingGirl7 » August 11, 2003

civicex2g wrote:afraid they might ruin the good CRX name? I think they should come out with the new crx.. i have faith in honda... everybody doubted the RSX... and now look everyone loves em, definately a worthy replacment for the loved integra... teh new si.. hmm no comment...they messed up there. but if they do come out i have faith in em
see, i think the rsx is horrid, as well as the honda focus...

i'm very disappointed with everything honda has produced lately (with the exception of the s2000, nsx -- although i don't like those much either, and... well, that's probably about it)
Image

http://www.jdmlifestyle.com

My Rides: 1990 Civic CRX DX --> Glasstop SiR // 1995 Civic del Sol Si

civicex2g
85% JDM
Posts: 1518
Joined: August 07, 2003
Location: Floriduh
Contact:

Post by civicex2g » August 12, 2003

ah ok... well when the rsx first came out i was also a bit bleh about its looks, but now I love the car, the Civic Minivan is just ugly... only thing i like about that car are the seats, not even the type R version grabs my attention. ofcourse S2000 and NSX are timeless wonders. And they need to come out with a TSX-S, but they arent... In my opinion I really think honda better get their shit str8 because all the other car manuf are coming out with some top notch shit... for cheaper or same prices. Spec-V's are super cheap and can kill an Si.... for 1 little example.. and this is not even mentioning the beloved SRT-4 which is a freak of nature

CivicRacingGirl7
50% ricer
Posts: 417
Joined: February 04, 2003
Location: NY
Contact:

Post by CivicRacingGirl7 » August 12, 2003

lol, not a fan of the srt-4 either... never been a dodge fan...

but i hear what you're saying about honda getting their shit straight... they've gone downhill in the appearance department, and performance isn't much better. they're still doing the 160hp thing, and even the s2ks with 240hp are the same, if not more money, than cars with 280 hp. guess we'll have to see what this s2000 2.2 liter will be like :/

as for the rsx, i remember seeing the pictures a year or so before it was actually going to change, and thinking it was hideous. it was about time the body on the integra changed, but blech... i thought i'd get used to them, but it's been years and i still have yet... i will admit that i have seen two rsx's that looked decent, but still nothing i'd drive... one was gold with gunmetal wheels (saw it driving, don't remember anything else), and the other was this clean as hell white one :/

civicex2g
85% JDM
Posts: 1518
Joined: August 07, 2003
Location: Floriduh
Contact:

Post by civicex2g » August 12, 2003

yeah with the RSX they made it look NOTHING like its older brother... and the Si.. hmmm.. lmao... s2000 way to expensive... hope the 2.2 makes a big diff. I personally would rather get a 350z then the s2000... 350z is more engine.. more low end.. s2000 you have to be at like 6700rpm or higher to get anything. Nissan is making nice cars.... Subaru (hmm wrx sti) Mitsubishi flopped in my opinion with the Eclipse.. but made it up with the Evo... Acura just came out with the TSX... but it has no balls.. grrr honda get your shit str8

CivicRacingGirl7
50% ricer
Posts: 417
Joined: February 04, 2003
Location: NY
Contact:

Post by CivicRacingGirl7 » August 12, 2003

my boyfriend has an s2000, and it is fun to drive. the 2.2 is only gonna be 10 more hp i believe, but it'll have the torque it's lacking now.

considering the evos and stis are around the same price range as the s2000, it's not THAT expensive anymore...

alexsracing
60% ricer
Posts: 353
Joined: August 06, 2003
Location: mcallen, tx
Contact:

Post by alexsracing » August 17, 2003

8)
d16z6 turbo crx 12.6 @ 111 spinning 1st and 2nd
eclipse 14b turbo
Image

User avatar
tenchu
Posts: 5691
Joined: July 11, 2003
Location: Somewhere, Iraq
Contact:

Post by tenchu » August 28, 2003

me want! me want! :)
Image
1993 RHD Impreza : Brembo : Zeal : Whiteline : Prodrive : Enkie : Cusco'd out

phan
40% JDM
Posts: 1142
Joined: December 15, 2003
Location: los angeles
Contact:

Post by phan » December 17, 2003

randy wrote:thats a fuckin awesome ass photo shop.....fuckin professional shit..man it sure looks so damn real but u can tell it was peiced together from other honda's...rear quarter window looks like rsx and the fog lense area are so CL
actually the rear quarter window is an insight window...that horrid panel over the rear wheel was the only photoshop done to that part. :up:

stinky
85% ricer
Posts: 154
Joined: November 05, 2003
Location: mississippi

Post by stinky » December 18, 2003

that is one sick lil car i love it
i'm back!!!!!!!!!

phan
40% JDM
Posts: 1142
Joined: December 15, 2003
Location: los angeles
Contact:

Post by phan » December 18, 2003

CivicRacingGirl7 wrote:i prefer a second gen over anything...

i actually don't want them to come out with another generation crx. i've only spoken to a few people who seem to agree on this, though.
i'm one of them. that insight photoshop is nice, but highly doubtful that the new crx would resemble it...

now, not too many people can say they have a clean crx...it's almost like being part of a unique club. if a new gen comes out, then everyone in their mother will be a "crx owner." damnit, i can't have that...i've worked too hard to make my crx look nice. :P

Post Reply